Following the tragedy of the horrific incident at Bondi, Australia is facing several pressing conversations. There is a much-needed national focus on antisemitism, an ongoing worry about public safety, and inquiries about how such an tragedy could occur. However, as viewed of a public health expert and Australian Jew, the most important dialogue we are finally having centers on firearms.
Health experts have been sounding alarms about guns for a minimum of a ten-year period. Following the events of the Port Arthur massacre, Australians united and implemented a suite of reforms to curb gun violence across the country. The strategy succeeded. Prior to 1996, the nation experienced approximately one large-scale firearm incident per year. Over the following years, there have been extremely rare significant tragedies, with none approaching the death toll of the incidents in the 1980s and 1990s.
Amidst the Bondi events, the nation's gun laws were not entirely useless. Reports indicate the individuals involved might have been armed with bolt-action rifles and at least one straight-pull shotgun. These weapons are limited to firing a one round at a time, necessitating a physical action to ready the subsequent shot. Although these guns are capable of being discharged rapidly with devastating effect, they remain significantly less rapid and more cumbersome than the large-magazine, self-loading rifles frequently used in international attacks. The casualty count at Bondi would've been far higher if more advanced weapons had been accessible.
Preventing another Bondi demands unity across all states. Regrettably, there are already cracks in the facade.
However, the terrible toll of the attack reveals that existing gun laws are failing. Crafted in the late 1990s with the best of intentions, decades have worn away their efficacy. Alarmingly, there are currently more firearms in Australia than prior to the Port Arthur massacre, with some individuals in urban areas owning arsenals of hundreds of weapons.
We have been overconfident and it has exacted a terrible price.
Since the Bondi tragedy, there have been numerous declarations regarding new gun laws. New South Wales in particular will shortly enact a package of reforms to reduce the collective risk posed by firearms. The federal government has proposed a new firearm surrender scheme, and there is hope for a countrywide gun database, notwithstanding the inherent challenges of coordinating state and federal governments.
All of this are only possible provided that the nation works together. As noted, regarding gun control, the country is dependent on its weakest link. This is the reality of the Australian system – regulations in one state are easily circumvented if they can be avoided with a short drive across a border.
There is the inevitable response that "guns don't kill people, individuals are". This is accurate in the same sense that planes don't transport people, aviators do. Certainly, aircraft require operators, but it would be virtually impossible for a pilot to move 500 people overseas without the aircraft. The mass slaughter witnessed at Bondi would be extremely difficult without guns, and would have been far less damaging if the accused individuals had been denied access to the weapons they used.
It is acknowledged there are legitimate reasons for some Australians to own firearms. Farm work or culling pests in rural areas is incredibly hard without them. A complete removal of guns from the country is impractical, as in some cases they are indispensable.
What we can do – the imperative action – is to guarantee that gun laws are updated to accurately reflect the world we live in today. Australia's legislation have historically been the envy of the world, but the passage of years has taken a toll and the nation is less secure as it previously was. It is vital to learn from the tragedy of Bondi seriously, and make certain that future generations are as protected as past generations have been.
As one commentator remarked after the Bondi attack, "things like this just don't happen here". They don't, but solely due to the fact that the country has made concerted efforts to keep itself safe. As nightmarish as the attack was, there is an aspiration that it can serve as the last one the nation experiences.
A seasoned financial analyst and writer passionate about empowering others through clear, actionable advice on money and life.